[PATCH 1/3] lz32/tests: Test more last errors set by
wine.dev at web.de
Sun Oct 8 13:03:25 CDT 2006
On Mi, 2006-10-04 at 23:22 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> > For the normal case, SetLastError() is called only on failure.
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/debug/base/setlasterror.asp
> Do we trust MSDN when we can check things ourselves? No, we don't trust,
> right? :)
We trust MSDN, as log as we detect, that something is missing or wrong.
> I want to ensure no algorithmic logic was flawed in
> A-version or in W-version of mentioned function. Hence my intense testing
> for SetLastError(). I hoped this would let me easier to (re)build code
> for LZOpenFile[AW]. It would make the code stricter. So I won't be lost
> in some lots of possible solutions ;)
It's ok for learning and internal tests, but Alexandre teached me, not
to put everything in the testsuite.
He specially mentioned to avoid testing GetLastError() on success,
unless an Application need this behavior.
An current Example from "localspl.dll" => pfnEnumPorts:
With the native dlls (w2k+xp) on wine, GetLastError() return always
10047 on Success.
The Reason was easy to find after the message from wine:
fixme:winsock:convert_af_w2u unhandled Windows address family 26
Our ws2_32.dll does not Support WS_AF_IRDA (26) => AF_IRDA (23 on linux)
By by ... Detlef
More information about the wine-devel