Monday's valgrind results: no new errors

[Alistair Leslie-Hughes]

Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10-summary.txt
>> seems to show lots of valgrind regressions in mshtml, but
>> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-10/vg-mshtml_dom-diff.txt
>> shows the difference is that I happen to have installed Gecko.
>> So they aren't really regressions (or if there are any, they're
>> buried in the noise), and today's git is probably about
>> as Valgrind-clean as Saturday's.
>> - Dan
>>
> Hi Dan,
> 
>  From todays list there isn't a memory leak in vg-shlwapi_string.txt 
> from but on the 8th there was.  Just a little concerned that something 
> has been missed. I have a patch locally that I haven't submitted yet.
> 
> Also vg-msxml3_domdoc.txt has 2 "Conditional jump or move depends on 
> uninitialised value" statements that don't appear in todays results.
> 
Just ignore the last domdoc comment.  Its the noise of 
err:msxml:create_node shouldn't be here!.  That I am not seeing.

Best