New bugzilla components.

[James Hawkins]

On Dec 16, 2007 6:20 AM, Jan Zerebecki <jan.wine at zerebecki.de> wrote:
>
> For me with this renaming is important that at least from the
> description it should then be absolutely clear what goes into a
> component and what not (for a developer).
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > > What's happened to the proposal to remove the wine- prefix from
> > > bugzilla components and have the components represent the dlls
> > > they belong to?
>
> I didn't want to remove the wine- prefix without also getting
> most of the other wanted changes done in the same go. But those
> require that someone gets a list of the exact changes posted and
> agreed upon on. I didn't have time for that yet... but if none of
> the other admins get it done I can probably find the time to make
> the changes in such a list.
>
> I think such a list would need: old name (empty for new
> components); new name; description (should list other names that are associated with the
> component or things contained in the component, list of source
> files that this component contains with bash style globs).
>
> We can also change the default assignee (currently
> wine-bugs at winehq.org for all components) and/or default cc list
> (AFAIK currently empty for all components).
>
> Possibly bad example:
> wine-directx-dshow; directx-dshow; DirectShow ( dlls/{quartz,msdmo,qcap}/ );
>     dshow-hacker at test.test; dshowhacker2 at test.test, dhowhacker3 at test.text;
>
> If we want to move all the bugs from one component to other
> components we can delete the component after it doesn't contain
> any bugs anymore:
>
> wine-foo; deprecated-foo; Bugs in this component should be moved to bar or misc.
>
> > This would be really nice, however not sure how much work will it take.
> > Don't think bugzilla supports renaming of the components. Might need some
> > custom converter.
>
> Bugzilla supports renaming components.
>

Ok, I'll start off the list.  This is a first draft, open to changes
and discussion.  Entries with a (?) means I'm not sure.

Components:

test ->
wine-advapi32 -> advapi32
wine-atl -> atl
wine-binary ->
wine-comctl32 -> comctl32
wine-console -> console (?)
wine-crypt32 -> crypt32
wine-dbghelp -> dbghelp
wine-debug ->
wine-directx* -> directx* (?)
wine-documentation -> documentation
wine-dos -> dos
wine-dotnet -> (?) I have a feeling this should be a keyword
wine-files ->
wine-gdi-(printing) -> wine-gdi32
wine-gdiplus -> gdiplus
wine-gui ->
wine-help -> hhctrl. the remaining wine-help bugs should be user32 if
they're not hhctrl.
wine-ipc ->
wine-kernel -> kernel32
wine-loader ->loader
wine-misc -> misc or default
wine-msi -> msi
wine-msvcrt -> msvcrt
wine-msxml -> msxml(3)
wine-multimedia ->
wine-net ->
wine-ole -> ole
wine-opengl -> opengl keyword (?)
wine-patches ->
wine-ports ->
wine-programs -> programs (might want to keep it wine-programs to not
confuse users)
wine-quartz -> quartz
Wine-Rebar -> bugs moved to comctl32
wine-resources ->
wine-richedit -> richedit
wine-setupapi -> setupapi
wine-shdocvw -> shdocvw
wine-shell32 -> shell32
wine-sspi -> (?) I prefer individual modules with a security or sspi
keyword, but it's not up to me
wine-tools -> (?)
wine-urlmon -> urlmon
wine-user -> user32
wine-usp10.dll -> usp10
wine-winelib ->
wine-x11driver -> x11driver
-> wininet
-> wintrust
-> secur32
-> advpack
-> hhctrl
-> imagehlp
-> shlwapi


-- 
James Hawkins