bugs audit volunteers required

[Austin English]

On Dec 31, 2007 5:56 PM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest at gmail.com> wrote:
> We would be doing this for 1-2 months as the Wine 1.0 release might
> happen in may be next 6-7 months time. We might expect lotta bugzilla
> activity as wine goes out of beta.
> and all the old bugs will be ignored and bugs grow exponentially.
> There will be lotta bugzilla spam, we cant avoid it ;)
> Last time it was mostly done by Jonathan Ernst and others, also by me

I've got some spare time/bandwith to do this, but had been holding
back to prevent the flood of bugzilla mail. But like you said, this
needs to be done before 1.0, so if we're ready to do it now, I'll
start triaging a lot more old stuff. I'll wait a day or so to get some
more replies before though.

On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those
> persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should have a bug
> moderation? Only allow bugs that follow the criterion, then have a way
> for bugzilla admins to accept bug reports and then a new bug report
> entry is created in bugzilla.
>
> -Maarten

Does bugzilla support this? How about not allowing someone without
higher bugzilla privileges to reopen bugs?