Time for wine-mono or wine-dotnet11 component in Bugzilla?

Tony Lambregts tony.lambregts at gmail.com
Sat Jan 6 12:00:16 CST 2007

Dan Kegel wrote:
> While filing
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7098
> I realized that I'm starting to see lots of apps
> that require dot net, and there are two ways
> we could go to support them:
> 1) get msft's dotnetfx.exe to install (see
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5358) and work
> 2) whip our mono integration into shape (see
> http://kegel.com/wine/fakedotnet.sh )
> The question is, how should we tag bugs in
> bugzilla that fail because neither of these
> approaches really work yet?
> Should we make them depend on bug 5358,
> or should we create a new bug component, wine-dotnet11 or wine-mono,
> and put them in there?   Filing these bugs
> as wine-misc seems wrong, so I'm leaning towards
> a new bugzilla component.
> - Dan

I think that it should be a component. I would say wine-dotnet.


Tony Lambregts

More information about the wine-devel mailing list