How should the win16 test suite be arranged?
dank at kegel.com
Mon Jul 16 07:26:21 CDT 2007
On 7/16/07, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> I don't think we want to do it that way, we should use a Unix version
> of OpenWatcom, and detect it in configure.
The OpenWatcom guys haven't gotten around
to making Linux packages available from their main
download site. It should happen eventually.
> > Or would you prefer the win16 tests stay out of tree
> > forever? That's an option, too; people who want
> > to run them could download them from kegel.com or
> > something, and it wouldn't stop Codeweavers from
> > running them in cxtest.
> It depends how many tests there are, but if it's just a few that's
> probably the best solution, we wouldn't want to have to maintain a lot
> of makefile infrastructure just for a couple of tests. Somehow I doubt
> that we'll see a lot of development on win16 tests...
OK, separate download for now.
More information about the wine-devel