defining and revamping our bugzilla categories
James Hawkins
truiken at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 17:43:02 CDT 2007
On 10/11/07, Jesse Allen <the3dfxdude at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <truiken at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev at web.de> wrote:
> > > On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > >
> > > > wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
> > >
> > > This is a bad Idea.
> > > We have a lot of different dlls related to printing:
> > >
> > > comdlg32.dll
> > > compstui.dll
> > > gdi32.dll
> > > localspl.dll
> > > printui.dll
> > > shell32.dll
> > > wineps.drv
> > > winspool.drv
> > >
> > > I vote for "printing" next to "gdi"
> > >
> >
> > What's wrong with having a new printing component? Lumping *all*
> > gdi/printing bugs into gdi-(printing) is a bad idea.
> >
> > --
> > James Hawkins
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> How about "gdi-printing" and "gdi-video"?
>
No, because not all printing problems are gdi, and if you don't have
gdi-printing, there's no need for gdi-video; just plain gdi works.
The same argument goes for gdi-video. So, we should have:
gdi
printing
and any bugs that are marked as wine-gdi-(printing) should be set to
one or the other.
--
James Hawkins
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list