defining and revamping our bugzilla categories
fgouget at free.fr
Fri Oct 12 03:36:01 CDT 2007
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Steven Edwards wrote:
> > gdi
> > printing
> Yes I second this motion. The components should be named as simply as
> possible. Users are going to be the ones filing the reports and
> whoever is doing triage is going to have to move it around if its in
> the wrong area. Abstract names like DirectX, Sound, Graphics,
> Installers and Printing are a much better idea than dllnames.
Sounds good to me too.
But just for the sake of it, I will mention that we have keywords too.
So we can have broad categories like 'printing' and 'display', and
dll-specific keywords like 'gdi32' and 'comctl32'.
Or we can do the opposite and have broad keywords for 'printing' and
'display', and then dll-specific categories.
Or we could stay with the current scheme because both of the above may
be abuses of the keyword system.
Up to you.
One more issue to raise: is the reason why we have 'wine-' as the prefix
to avoid conflicts between different products? That is, if we have a
'printing' category in the 'Wine' product, is it going to interfer with
the 'printing' category of a 'Wine-doc' product?
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/
May your Tongue stick to the Roof of your Mouth with the Force of a Thousand Caramels.
More information about the wine-devel