[PATCH 3/3] configure: Use 0 instead of NULL because NULL isn't defined.

[Ken Thomases]

On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:

> Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 23:18:51 schrieb Ken Thomases:
>> This makes the test test the proper thing on Mac OS X.  It still  
>> fails, but
>> for a good reason.
>> ---
>>   configure.ac |    6 +++---
>>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>> -    char *name=NULL;
>> +    char *name=0;
> Shouldn't that be (void *) 0 or (char *) 0?
>

I don't think that's necessary.  It compiled without warning here,  
even with -Wall.  Doesn't the C standard says that 0 casts to a  
pointer naturally?  Maybe that's C++.

-Ken