user32: Make message test pass cleanly under XP SP2

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Alexandre Julliard" <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:

> Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry at codeweavers.com> writes:
> 
>>      /* posted message */
>>      PostMessageA( hwnd, WM_CHAR, dbch[0], 0 );
>> +    msg.message = 0xdeadbeef;
>>      ok( !PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "got message %x\n", msg.message );
>>      PostMessageA( hwnd, WM_CHAR, dbch[1], 0 );
>>      ok( PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "no message\n" );
>>      ok( msg.message == WM_CHAR, "unexpected message %x\n", msg.message );
>>      ok( msg.wParam == wch, "bad wparam %lx/%x\n", msg.wParam, wch );
>> +    msg.message = 0xdeadbeef;
>>      ok( !PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "got message %x\n", msg.message );
>>  
>>      /* posted thread message */
>>      PostThreadMessageA( GetCurrentThreadId(), WM_CHAR, dbch[0], 0 );
>> +    msg.message = 0xdeadbeef;
>>      ok( !PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "got message %x\n", msg.message );
>>      PostMessageA( hwnd, WM_CHAR, dbch[1], 0 );
>>      ok( PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "no message\n" );
>>      ok( msg.message == WM_CHAR, "unexpected message %x\n", msg.message );
>>      ok( msg.wParam == wch, "bad wparam %lx/%x\n", msg.wParam, wch );
>> +    msg.message = 0xdeadbeef;
>>      ok( !PeekMessageW( &msg, hwnd, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE ), "got message %x\n", msg.message );
> 
> I'm not sure I see the point of that change, since the message is not
> tested when PeekMessage fails.

I added that changes because Microsoft compiler from latest Vista SDK
complains that variables might be used without being initialized.

-- 
Dmitry.