Pulse Audio -- Wine should have instructions on this web site
marcus at jet.franken.de
Wed Apr 2 14:12:54 CDT 2008
> > >> This has been brought up before, and it's quite a bit of work. You
> > >> can't just simply forward everything to pulse call it a day, you'd
> > >> need to implement a full structure/drivers/etc., which would require
> > >> quite a bit of time/work and is likely outside of the scope of 1.0.
> > >>
> > >
> > > And I believe Julliard rejected the idea of adding a pulseaudio driver.
> > Nope! He isn't against a pulseaudio driver. He is against yet another
> > broken and half implemented driver for the desktop sound system that
> > happens to be en vogue at the moment.
> > I think he would love to see a clean, full implemented pulseaudio
> > driver; presented in a nice easy review-able patch series which cleans
> > up the wineaudio driver mess en passant.
> "No, the right answer is to make the Alsa driver work right. We need to
> stop rushing out to write a new driver every time there's a problem with
> an existing one, all it leads to is more broken drivers."
... I also guess no one is stopping people from writing a pulseaudio driver.
Its just that it needs to make certain criteria before inclusion, after we
got burned with esound, arts, nas, etc etc etc etc.
More information about the wine-devel