appdb needs to list 0.9.47 in the pulldown, please
fgouget at free.fr
Mon Apr 7 04:30:56 CDT 2008
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Chris Morgan wrote:
> I'm all for adapting our behavior to better fit with the behavior of
> our users. I've spent hundreds of hours working on improving the
> If there was a good reason stated to accept results for obsoleted
> versions then I'd agree with you. In the future I can see a need to
> pin certain versions to the available versions list, certainly 1.0
> seems like a pretty obvious version to pin to the list for a period of
If the cutoff is '0.9.48' (for instance), then maybe we could add a
'pre-0.9.48' version. That way users looking for '0.9.47' would know
what to use. This would also let bugzilla maintainers easily spot bugs
against obsolete versions.
Then when the cutoff evolves to 0.9.53 or whatever we would rename the
'pre-0.9.48' version to 'pre-0.9.53', etc. If renaming versions is not
allowed in Bugzilla, then we'd need a more stable name for the catch all
version, maybe something like 'older versions' or ome such.
The one remaining problem may be to get the version order-right but that
can probably be solved by getting creative with the version name, e.g.
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/
We are Pentium of Borg. You will be approximated. Division is futile.
More information about the wine-devel