Regressions: the enemy of 1.0
Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 23:41:05 CDT 2008
Hi Dan,
2008/4/20, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com>:
> There's been lots of progress in Wine lately; many
> important applications work better than ever.
> But the inevitable cost of such progress is that
> some applications are now broken and/or
> wine has odd problems.
>
> For instance, as of the last two versions of Wine,
> StarUML can't be unminimized
> ( http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12697 ),
> and as of 0.9.60, the IME support seems to be
> making wine apps run dog slow on at least one
> of my machines
> ( http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-April/064999.html ).
> These seem like regressions that ought to be fixed
> before 1.0.
Worse still, after all of the work I've done on getting most tests
running there have been 3 new failures in make test:
setupapi/devinst.ok
devinst.c:831: Test failed: SetupDiEnumDeviceInterfaces failed: 00000103
devinst.c:850: Test failed: Unexpected path �
devinst.c:920: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got deadbeef
devinst.c:925: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got deadbeef
devinst.c:1013: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got deadbeef
devinst.c:1018: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got deadbeef
msxml3/domdoc.ok
domdoc.c:2323: Test failed: ret 80004005
domdoc.c:2327: Test failed: incorrect get_text string
mshtml/dom.ok
dom.c:1048: Test failed: Could not get
{3050F4AE-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} interface: 80004002
Is anyone working in these areas willing to look into the test failures?
Cheers,
Maarten.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list