[Bug 14810] WinHttp needs to be implemented

[James Hawkins]

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:43 PM,  <wine-bugs at winehq.org> wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Erich Hoover <ehoover at mines.edu>  2008-08-10 18:43:16 ---
> This whole DLL has a total of 27 functions, 14 of which are currently exposed,
> and only 1 is "implemented".  I put some work into implementing enough of the
> DLL to get RA3 to authenticate and found that it needs 9 of the functions to
> operate properly.  I think it is reasonable to say that implementing the rest
> of the functions for WinHttp would not be too difficult.  I do not think that
> this particular issue is anywhere close to a broad-spectrum "Win32 API needs to
> be implemented".
>

Of course it's not the same scale as all of the Win32 API.  It was an
analogy illustrating why the bug is superfluous.  On the other hand,
you're vastly underestimating the amount of work needed to properly
implement winhttp.  You might want to chat with Zac Brown who is
working on implementing winhttp right now.  Also, please don't post in
closed bugs.

-- 
James Hawkins