[PATCH] AcceptEx Impelementation

Scott Lindeneau slindeneau at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 11:56:02 CDT 2008


> ??  Not sure what you're talking about there.  Your tests
> should not try to get at any hidden Wine info.  They
> should simply use plain old Windows networking calls
> that should not complicate the wineserver.
> - Dan

Ah. My apologies. My question was related to writing the
implementation of acceptex. I have recently solved the problem and the
question is now moot. The problem was related to a bug in the
wineserver async implementation that appeared when a file descriptor
handled its own polling events (like sockets) and garbage collection.
Fixing the bug fixes the problem i was having earlier. Should I
include those fixes in a separate patch or can I incorporate them into
the acceptex patch? (Correct AcceptEx implementation relies on it).



More information about the wine-devel mailing list