Patchwatcher: failed regression tests: d3dx8: replace loops with explicit computations to make them faster [PATCH] d3dx8: replace loops by explicit computations

[Dan Kegel]

You can't just declare a patch series for
the last patch, as you seem to have done here:

d3dx8, test [patch 3/3] test the relative error instead of the
absolute one to avoid rounded errors

That confuses patchwatcher (and maybe even humans).

That patch should have come first, to avoid having the tree in broken state.
- Dan


On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> Patchwatcher notes that the conformance test fails here:
>
> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M d3dx8.dll -T ../../.. -p
> d3dx8_test.exe.so math.c && touch math.ok
> math.c:442: Test failed: Expected matrix=
> (-0.214800,1.311600,0.475200,0.000000
>  0.950400,-0.883600,0.924400,0.000000
>  1.021200,0.193600,-1.358800,0.000000
>  18.298500,-29.624001,15.683499,1.000000
> )
>
> Got matrix=
> (-0.214800,1.311600,0.475200,0.000000
>  0.950401,-0.883601,0.924400,0.000000
>  1.021204,0.193593,-1.358803,0.000000
>  18.298538,-29.624159,15.683425,1.000000)
>
> Looks like rounding errors, but one way or another, you have to take
> care of that.
>
> Also: did you benchmark this change to verify it actually made
> things faster?  Unrolling loops is no longer as sure-fire a win as
> it used to be.  I'm inclined to prefer the more compact, clear
> loop unless there's hard evidence it's > 1% slower.
> - Dan
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <patchwatcher at kegel.com>
> Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:35 PM
> Subject: Patchwatcher: failed regression tests: d3dx8: replace loops
> with explicit computations to make them faster [PATCH] d3dx8: replace
> loops by explicit computations
> To: dank at kegel.com
>
>
> Hi!  This is the experimental automated wine patchwatcher thingy.
> The latest git sources were built and tested with your patch
> "d3dx8: replace loops with explicit computations to make them faster
> [PATCH] d3dx8: replace loops by explicit computations"
> Result: the patch failed regression tests.
>
> You can retrieve the full build results at
>  http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/264.log
> and see the patch as parsed at
>  http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/264.txt
> See
>  http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results
> for more info.
>