gecko download not robust?
austinenglish at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 11:55:26 CST 2008
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss
<tehblunderbuss at gmail.com> wrote:
> marco wrote:
> > I looked into it.
> > And there are some options.
> > I can make a separate package of gecko that I can make it a
> > dependencie of wine.
> > Problem is people have to know where to find it or the get stuck.
> > I can also make the package and make it not a dependencie on wine but
> > the the people don't know it exist.
> > And I can just put it in the wine package.
> > I think this is the best option in this case. Its the easiest option
> > because people only have to download en install one package.
> > marco
> This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much,
> like Debian.
> Who wants to find out that you need so many wine* packages in order to
> get something to work?
Agreed, but I don't think wine, wine-dev, and wine-gecko is too much,
especially considering that wine-gecko rarely changes...
More information about the wine-devel