stefandoesinger at gmx.at
Mon Feb 18 16:33:58 CST 2008
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 06:34:04 schrieb Edward Savage:
> Maarten why not focus on supporting applications that don't have viable
> open source solutions first? I can think of hundreds.
> The only thing iTunes will add, with full support, is ipod syncing (that
> isn't useless).
> Or should we avoid that debate?
I think it would probably be better not to debate, but the issue is this: For
you there are viable itunes alternatives, and for you there are other
applications which do not have alternatives. Compare this to the discussions
wether working on Microsoft Office is a waste of time or not. Everyone has
other expectations, so it is *very* hard to judge which application will be
useful and which not.
In the same way the usefullness of $APP in Wine differs from person to person.
A bug which is worth a small remark on a review for one person is a killer
bug for another.
To come back to iTunes, I have met a few people who considered Linux but were
stopped by iTunes for various reasons. Some may seem laughable to tech-savy
people(Other apps look differently), some are technically reasonable(iTunes
shop, DRM support). Of couse you can find 100 reasons why AutoCAD is more
important than iTunes, but you can also find 100 reasons why iTunes is more
important than ACAD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20080218/758cae8c/attachment.pgp
More information about the wine-devel