Splitting up ole component

[Rob Shearman]

2008/7/2 Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com>:
> Rob wrote:
>>> Oh, and there was no rpcrt4 component to
>>> be selected for this bug in bugzilla, you might consider to add one.
>>
>>Currently, we are using the "ole" component for RPC bugs, including
>>rpcrt4 and widl, but I agree that this isn't clear. I think we should
>>probably split the ole component up into rpc (which would be a
>>container for rpcrt4 & widl issues), ole32 and oleaut32.
>
> I've added the rpc component, been wanting to do that for a while.
>
> As for the other proposed change: the description for ole is currently
>
> OLE, Active X (
> dlls/{ole32,oleacc,oleaut32,olecli32,oledlg,olepro32,olesvr32,olethk32,stdole2.tlb,stdole32.tlb}/
> )
>
> That's a lot more than just ole32 and oleaut32.  Can you propose
> descriptions for the ole* components after the change?

How about these:

ole32:
OLE (dlls/{ole32,oleacc,olecli32,oledlg,olepro32,olesvr32,olethk32})
oleaut32:
OLE Automation (dlls/{oleaut32,stdole2.tlb,stdole32.tlb})
rpc:
DCE/RPC (dlls/rpcrt4, tools/widl and widl-generated files)

-- 
Rob Shearman