Thoughts on implementation of winhttp.dll
zac at zacbrown.org
Thu Jul 3 11:46:17 CDT 2008
Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 23:56:51 Rob Shearman wrote:
>> How about:
>> 3) Copy the networking sublayer from wininet into winhttp and build on top
>> of that to implement winhttp. Reimplement wininet on top of winhttp.
> Drawback to this option is that you're going to destabilize wininet, but
> perhaps this is feasible now that we have a stable branch.
I can see that it would be useful to do this so only one http set of functions
need be updated as adjustments are made.
I'd say it would definitely be something to do well after winhttp is stabilized.
More information about the wine-devel