[dplayx 02/29] Tests for DirectPlayCreate

[James Hawkins]

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Michael Karcher
<wine at mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hello Ismael,
>
> reviewing this patch shows some issues.
>
> > +#define _okHR(expected, result)                         \
>> +    ok( (expected) == (result),                         \
>> +        "expected=%d(%s) got=%d(%s)\n",                 \
>> +        HRESULT_CODE(expected), dpResult2str(expected), \
>> +        HRESULT_CODE(result), dpResult2str(result) );
> I dislike the order of the parameters and the name. You would write
>  ok( hr == DP_OK, "Something failed with %x\n", hr);
> In this line, "hr" is before "DP_OK". So as an analogy, I also want to
> write
>  _okHR( hr, DD_OK );
>
> Why do you start the macro name with an underscore? And last but not
> least: As I see it, a static inline would do the job too, and is always
> preferrable to macros.
>

We use macros for this (ok*/expected) all over the code base whenever
the check is small enough.  See dlls/comctl32/tests/trackbar.c:28 for
an example.  If you use an inlined function, you either have to pass
the __LINE__ value to the function or wrap the call to the function in
a macro anyway.

-- 
James Hawkins