[1/2] server: fix async read on mailslot

Andrey Turkin andrey.turkin at gmail.com
Sun Jul 20 08:47:52 CDT 2008

2008/7/19 Michael Karcher <wine at mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>:

> Am Freitag, den 18.07.2008, 20:37 +0400 schrieb Andrey Turkin:
> > Also, please attach patches with disposition inline, not attachment
> > (git can do that) - this make review somehow easier.
> If this is an official wine policy (I do see your point), please update
> http://www.winehq.org/site/sending_patches , it tells to use the
> --attach option in the imap case.
It looks that most of patch authors doesn't follow this guide (from last 16
patches I've seen one with Content-Disposition: Attachment and 15 either
with Content-Disposition: Inline or with inline patches). Anyone, is there
some reason to keep the guide which noone follows?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20080720/7059ad2c/attachment.htm 

More information about the wine-devel mailing list