Wine-1.0 release notes

[Austin English]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Tom Wickline <twickline at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Zachary Goldberg <zgs at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tom Wickline <twickline at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
>>> <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
>>>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>>>> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
>>>>> place, and make it very clear that we believe Wine 1.0 to be the best
>>>>> version of Wine yet in all cases (ie, no regressions).
>>>>
>>>> I'd disagree on "the best" part. Looking at bugzilla and forum people thing
>>>> that 0.9.58 and possibly older would qualify more.
>>>>
>>>
>>> 0.9.58 is the best release to date! Office 2007 will run it's best in
>>> this release,
>>> and has been broke in every release after this. Their are other apps
>>> and games that have regressed as well...
>>>
>>> -Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> If you know of such cases why didn't you file any regressions in the
>> past month during the regression hunt?
>>
>> -Zach
>>
>
> Why, so they could be differed? I would hope most of the full
> time hackers here test against Office 07.. so im 100% sure
> the regressions are known. And if for some reason their not,
> its a hopeless case... and me filing a report or two isn't going to
> help very much.
>
> -Tom
>
>
>

The bugs may be deferred, but if the bugs aren't reported, no one
knows to fix them, albeit not likely until after 1.0.

Not reporting bugs is the software equivalent of people who don't vote
and expect politicians to change, get better, or do any damn bit of
good.

-Austin