yes I am trying to get feedback before I put it...

Christopher J. Ahrendt celticht32 at aol.com
Fri Jun 27 07:21:45 CDT 2008


Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> celticht32 at aol.com wrote:
>> on the patch list...
>>
>> The first patch is for a bug I tracked down in context.c that is 
>> causing some of the behavior that wine is having with the ATI graphics 
>> driver.
> That patch is no-op - it doesn't change anything.
> 
>>
>> The second patch  was something I noticed in the code as well that 
>> looked a little off which also relates to the way iPixel shaders are 
>> init in the d3d code.
>>
> I don't think the second patch is correct. Some parts of it - might be 
> but not all.
> 
> 
>> -    /* When findCompatible is set and no suitable format was found, 
>> let ChoosePixelFormat choose a pixel format in order not to crash. */
>> -    if(!iPixelFormat && !findCompatible) {
>> -        ERR("Can't find a suitable iPixelFormat\n");
>> -        return FALSE;
>> -    } else if(!iPixelFormat) {
>> -        PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd;
>> +    if(!iPixelFormat) {
>> +
> 
> Here you just ignoring the problem and not fixing anything. If Wine 
> coudn't find compatible format - then something is wrong and it's an error.
> 
> 
>> not sure about why the mailer is replacing spaces with ? that I do not 
>> know...
> 
> First of all use text only (no html) messages. Second, attach your 
> patches as text files to the e-mail message.
Thing is on the second fix i am not ignoring the fact that wine cant 
find an appropriate mode...  I am letting the check handle it.. If there 
is not a mode available then the check should fail. So is there a real 
need to have both ?




More information about the wine-devel mailing list