wine-bugs Digest, Vol 35, Issue 570

[Austin English]

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:40 AM,  <wine-bugs-request at winehq.org> wrote:
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:53:32 -0500
> From: wine-bugs at winehq.org
> Subject: [Bug 9787] Warcraft3 Battle.net Doesn't work (Needs AcceptEx)
> To: wine-bugs at winehq.org
> Message-ID: <E1KCrj2-0004Ic-W2 at wine.codeweavers.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9787
>
>
> Scott Lindeneau <slindeneau at gmail.com> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |slindeneau at gmail.com
>
> Raul <rcioldin at yahoo.com.br> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |rcioldin at yahoo.com.br
>

> --- Comment #206 from Scott Lindeneau <slindeneau at gmail.com>  2008-06-21 09:07:50 ---
> I have been reviewing the patch that Andrey Turkin submitted 2008-01-08 and
> would like to throw my 2 cents in. I haven't programmed in wine before, but I
> wouldn't mind starting. Please tell me how/if/why I am wrong.
>
> 1) AcceptEx can return synchronously, but it doesn't matter if it does or not.
>   * This means that for simplicity it shouldn't.
>
> 2) The AcceptEx call has all of the information it needs when its called.
>   * All of the variables passed to AcceptEx must be initialized before it is
> called.
>   * The AcceptEx function itself should only be a wrapper for a wine server
> call to start an async accept, and then it should return.
>
> 3) Essentially AcceptEx is an easy way to ask the Operating System to start a
> thread to listen on a socket, and to get rid of the thread automatically.
>   * We ask the wine server for an async accept (which should just be spawn a
> thread, listen, and return after connect)
>
> 4) AcceptEx only adds the ability to read data on the socket before the
> socket's error status changes from IO_PENDING to whatever.
>   * Why not add this functionality into the wine server's async accept?
>
>
> --- Comment #207 from Raul <rcioldin at yahoo.com.br>  2008-06-24 13:32:33 ---
> acceptex unnofficial patch in deb package please!
>
>
> --- Comment #208 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com>  2008-06-24 16:11:23 ---
> (In reply to comment #207)
>> acceptex unnofficial patch in deb package please!
>>
>
> Ask the maintainer to do that. Hacks are not accepted in WineHQ's codebase.
>
> You could compile it yourself...
>
>
> --- Comment #209 from Raul <rcioldin at yahoo.com.br>  2008-06-24 17:55:56 ---
> after a long time downloading and compiling....
>
> the "Disable completion port creation" patch didn't work...
>
> I just have to get in my git dir and do
> "patch -Np1 < mypatch.diff && tools/make_requests"???
>
>
> --- Comment #210 from Scott Lindeneau <slindeneau at gmail.com>  2008-06-29 02:53:29 ---
> (In reply to comment #209)
>> after a long time downloading and compiling....
>>
>> the "Disable completion port creation" patch didn't work...
>>
>> I just have to get in my git dir and do
>> "patch -Np1 < mypatch.diff && tools/make_requests"???
>>
>
> then you have to
>>make depend
>>make
>>sudo make uninstall
>>sudo make install
> and type your password if prompted for the sudo.
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
> above URL to reply.
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are watching all bug changes.
>
>

Did someone change the bugzilla settings recently? I'm subscribed to
wine-bugs in digest mode, but lately (past week or so?), it's been
repeating the past few changes of a bug with each new change, so some
high traffic bugs are sending 5-6 changes in one 'message'. It's
making the bugs harder to read IMHO. Can someone look into this, and
re-enable the old behavior?

Thanks!
Austin