WineHQ should discourage the use of cracks
Dan Kegel
dank at kegel.com
Tue Mar 4 12:04:47 CST 2008
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
<alex at thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> It might not be a good idea, but we could always introduce a new rating so
> that we have
>
>
> > > Garbage: No functionality, impossible to set up
> > > Bronze: Somewhat functional, may require hacks
> > > Silver: Mostly functional, requires hacks
> > > Gold: Mostly functional, does not require hacks
> > > Ivory: Fully functional, requires hacks
> > > Platinum: Fully functional, does not require hacks
>
> Not saying it's a good idea.
Too complicated. Reminds me of the us government's terror threat
level index :-)
> Otherwise, adding a 'difficulty' field sounds interesting. This would allow
> users to easily avoid apps that require a really complicated work-around,
> such as patching and compiling Wine. Then we could also add an option to
> turn on warnings if an app requires a crack, or we could censor it
> automatically based on GeoIP data.
Tempting but I think ultimately too complicated. I think we should
stick with a single rating scheme that requires 'no fiddling' for gold
or platinum.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list