Wine1.0 and LGPLv3?

[Kai Blin]

On Wednesday 19 March 2008 15:01:54 Ian Macfarlane wrote:
> Just to resurrect this topic, as last time, of the responses to my email,
> two were positive (and the other just pointed out that I'd mistaken the
> Samba licensing for LGPL instead of GPL) but nothing else happened after
> that.

I think the agreement from WineConf 2007 was to change as soon as there's a 
reason to do so. So far it seems like there isn't.

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer  http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer        http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member     http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20080322/5c63c150/attachment.pgp