[Bug 9484] Program refuses to run because of ProtectCD/ ProtectDISC copy-protection
truiken at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 13:06:30 CDT 2008
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM, James Hawkins <truiken at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/24/08, wine-bugs at winehq.org <wine-bugs at winehq.org> wrote:
> > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9484
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Comment #9 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> 2008-03-24 12:43:54 ---
> > > Can anyone test this in wine 0.9.58? Some other copy protections are working
> > > better, and if this isn't working yet, we might want to delay it to wine 1.2...
> > >
> > What's the point of having a blocker list if we keep deferring those
> > bugs? Granted not every bug in the list deserves a spot, but we need
> > to knuckle down and get these bugs fixed. When we get closer to the
> > release date, we can get a better idea of which bugs are not feasible
> > to fix before the release. Until that point, this bug list needs to
> > receive top priority.
> > --
> > James Hawkins
> I was going through a few of the 1.0 bugs that haven't been tested in
> a while. Since it has no demo, I can't personally test it, and was
> trying to see if any progress has been made in the past few months (as
> has been with SafeDisc). While it is certainly hard to tell if it can
> be fixed by 1.0, having someone test it and see how much closer we are
> to fixing it is the first step in figuring that out.
No objection there. My point about deferring bugs stands though.
More information about the wine-devel