Right way to cope with user error in make test?

[Dan Kegel]

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Austin English
<austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about
>> letting people build wine without a full complement
>> of development headers.  Maybe our configure
>> should have a sanity check at the end, and abort
>> if something optional but very common is missing;
>> we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable
>> configuring in that case if it's really intended.
>
> We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any
> dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.

That only helps dotests.  I'm thinking we should increase
build quality of wine for other situations, too.