Right way to cope with user error in make test?
dank at kegel.com
Fri May 16 14:57:17 CDT 2008
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Austin English
<austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about
>> letting people build wine without a full complement
>> of development headers. Maybe our configure
>> should have a sanity check at the end, and abort
>> if something optional but very common is missing;
>> we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable
>> configuring in that case if it's really intended.
> We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any
> dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.
That only helps dotests. I'm thinking we should increase
build quality of wine for other situations, too.
More information about the wine-devel