Right way to cope with user error in make test?
leslie_alistair at hotmail.com
Fri May 16 17:18:30 CDT 2008
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:49:37 -0500> From: jwhite at winehq.org> To: leslie_alistair at hotmail.com> CC: wine-devel at winehq.org> Subject: Re: Right way to cope with user error in make test?> > Hi Alistair,> > > This could be a good option. libxslt should properly be non-optional> > since msxml3 relys on it.> > > > From the Makefile.in, its appears to have linked to libxslt for quite some > > time,> > but was never an issue since it was never used.> > > > Francois Gouget raised this bug,> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035> > that libslt should be dynamic, which could be another option.> > I think in my case the problem is a bit different; I have the library -> what I don't have are the development headers. Thus the linking all> works, but HAVE_LIBXSLT is not defined, so the transform function> ends up as a stub, and goes on to fail.> > And I still don't know a right answer.> > The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case.> > Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks?> Looks good to me.
Search for local singles online @ Lavalife - Click here
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wine-devel