Right way to cope with user error in make test?

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Steven Edwards" <winehacker at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. really seems to me like the right method. including config.h in the
> test and doing something like
> 
> START_TEST(foo_and_bar)
> {
> #ifdef HAVE_FOO
> test_foo()
> #endif
> test_bar()
> }
> 
> I don't see why we can't do this along with embedding the config.h
> information the winetest transmission data. This will greatly help
> with the number of false failures.

That will make compiling tests under Windows even more cumbersome than
it is now, there is no such a thing as config.h under Windows.

-- 
Dmitry.