wine build time: 6 (or 3) minutes with q9400
zgold at bluesata.com
Fri Nov 7 20:27:16 CST 2008
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Hans Leidekker <hans at codeweavers.com>
> >> sec cpu wine notes
> >> 676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu 8.04
> >> 615 e7300 Nov
> >> 585 e7400 Nov (estimated, supposedly 5% faster than e7300)
> >> 540 e8400 Nov
> >> 360 q9400 Nov
> >> In all cases, this was with the default optimization
> >> level, -O2. Compiling with -O0 was roughly twice as fast
> >> dual core e7300 and e8400 used -j3; quad core -j5.
> > Does your measurement include running configure?
> No, nor make depend. Nor is it cold boot, it's after 'make clean'.
> I didn't control whether there was a previous run, so the cache may be
> warm or cold.
> > If I run make -j5 twice after 'make clean' on my q6600 2.4GHz system
> > and take the second measurement I get 223 seconds.
> > This is 64bit Ubuntu 8.10 with gcc-4.3.2 and default
> > optimization. Or perhaps disk IO is playing a role here?
> > I'm using a stripe set of two disks.
> Yes, could be disk I/O. This system has a crappy old parallel IDE drive.
> (Could also be the video; this system has an internal graphics card.)
> - Dan
Could you post photos and complete specs of the PW cluster somewhere? I'm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wine-devel