msi: Implement the DROP TABLE sql command.

[James Hawkins]

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Steven Edwards <winehacker at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:25 PM, James Hawkins <jhawkins at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> Hi,  I can't repro this problem on my machine, so I'm sending this
>> patch to patchwatcher by way of wine-patches to get some info.  Please
>> do not apply.
>
> Regarding our wineconf discussion about patchwatcher spam on
> wine-patches and filtering. Perhaps we need 2 email address patches
> can be sent to. My thinking is the flow could be something like:
>
> 1. By default everyone sends a patch to wine-patches
> 2. If a patch gets rejected the author gets a failure mail in private,
> and now retries or testing patches should go to wine-patches-testing N
> times until they get it right
> 3. once its right, patchwatch could then forward the new good patch to
> wine-patches or could send an email to the dev saying that its good
> enough to now send to wine-patches.
>
> Doing it like this, if everyone follows the rules, we won't get a ton
> of patchwatcher retries filling up wine-patches.
>

Just so everyone is clear, I emailed Dan before submitting the patches
asking if there was a way to send a patch directly to patchwatcher and
bypass wine-patches, but he said there's not a way yet and that
sending the patch to wine-patches should be OK for now.

-- 
James Hawkins