advapi32/tests: Run a test on more platforms.

[Nicolas Le Cam]

Hi,

Should I consider second solution ?
Or perhaps adding a comment explaining why we use the second provider
type key would be enough ?

Original patch is available at [1] for reference.

[1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-October/063475.html

Bye,
Nicolas Le Cam

2008/10/20 Nicolas Le Cam <niko.lecam at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Sometimes, the first Provider Type key (Microsoft Base Cryptographic
> Provider v1.0) doesn't have a TypeName subkey. It's the case on my Win2k
> box and according to test.winehq.org it seems to be the case for some
> other Win2k and Win98 boxes. So check for the second Provider Type
> instead.
>
> Checked on Win2k SP4 and WinXP SP3.
>
> We can also get rid of that skip by enumerating the Provider Type keys
> until we find one that fit our needs in FindProvTypesRegVals(). Tell me
> if this way is preferred, I will provide a modified patch.
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas Le Cam