secur32: Fix a failing test in win95
jhawkins at codeweavers.com
Wed Sep 24 05:47:22 CDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins
> <jhawkins at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> * Fix a failing test in win95.
>> dlls/secur32/tests/main.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> James Hawkins
> But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it?
Do you think returning SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION is acceptable
behavior for Wine?
> Shouldn't we use some kind of skip here? (The end result will be the
> same, as we should use win_skip, it just doesn't look correct).
There's really no point.
More information about the wine-devel