Wine sound discussion summary
reif at earthlink.net
Mon Dec 7 17:31:29 CST 2009
Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> So you mean keeping the existing infrastructure around just for midi
>> and have something entirely different for the rest of the audio
> That might nt be too bad in that we could still drop all the current
> current winmm audio backends that don't support Midi. At first glance:
> wineaudioio, wineesd, winejack, and winenas. So we'd just keep the Midi
> portion of winealsa, winecoreaudio and wineoss.
Can we drop all current audio drivers now that don't have midi?
Any driver that doesn't implement the complete winmm API and
direct sound shouldn't be in the current tree anyway.
More information about the wine-devel