truiken at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 23:51:16 CST 2009
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
>> With those changes, I now see 457 non-leak errors,
>> (~134 of which are due to the fresh regression
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20920 )
>> and 1560 leak errors
>> (~300 of which are due to ntlm_auth, which I'm still
>> trying to suppress), in the wine conformance test suite.
> I had a build problem (script error) that made test results
> from Monday through this morning funny. I reran after
> fixing the error; results at
> I now count 289 non-leak errors and 981 leak errors.
> Some of the remaining reported errors in msi are probably my
> fault - I'm running them in parallel. Probably making
> them all use different data files would do the trick...
> - Dan
I was wondering why you were getting so many msi test failures and
errors! Now I know. Yes, the msi tests can't be run in parallel,
even on windows. Vincent stated that he thinks the
StorageImpl_Construct bug is fixed, yet I'm still seeing the errors.
Vincent, can you take a look at the results?
More information about the wine-devel