Quick and dirty testcases for MS-DOS API?

[Austin English]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
> <dmitry at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> The exception tests in ntdll is a nice example how to do that
>> without hurting readability and maintainability.
>
> Sure, it's doable, but after a while one's fingers begin
> to bleed.  It all depends on how much code we're talking
> about, and how many people we expect to be able to
> write DOS testcases.
>
> Do you see any harm in using nasm?  I can't imagine
> it would be hard to update our list of build dependencies,
> and if anybody doesn't have it for some reason, no harm done...
> - Dan
>
>
>

How about we merge in the wine16 tests while we're at it?

-- 
-Austin