ws2/tests: Test AcceptEx with a deferred socket

[Paul Vriens]

Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
> Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):
> 
> Can you confirm that the new patch gives no failures?
> 
> Mike.
> 
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> Does the attached fix test failures on at least NT4? The 4000 test
>>> failures is ok, it's just 3999 of the same failure. The failures are
>>> the same because of a mistake on my part.
>>>
>>> I didn't get a chance to test this since my virtualbox is down until a
>>> 2.6.31-compatible version of their kernel module is out.
>>>
>>> Mike.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
>>>>> This tests the following AcceptEx scenario:
>>>>>  WSAAccept->CF_DEFER->AcceptEx
>>>>> Windows seems to return the deferred socket with AcceptEx (verified on
>>>>> XP & 2K3).
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> These new tests fail on all NT4 boxes (some 6 and 1 has 4000+ failures)
>>>> and
>>>> what looks like to be all Windows x64_64 systems. The strange thing (or
>>>> maybe not) is that the errors are the same on all of these (one box has
>>>> 4000+ failures but still has those same 6).
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>>>> http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/ws2_32:sock.html
>>>>
>>>> Could you have a look?
>>>>
>>>> I can do some tests if necessary on NT4, I don't have a Windows x86_64
>>>> system however.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Paul.
>>>>
>> This is what I now get on NT4:
>>
>> .....
>> sock.c:2819: Test failed: Did not get both connections, got 1
>> sock.c:2867: Test failed: bytesReturned isn't supposed to be 1
>> sock: 441754 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 2 failures), 4 skipped.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Paul.
>>
Hi Mike,

No failures on NT4 here with this one.

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.