[RFC] named pipe message-mode design
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
Wed Mar 4 12:10:31 CST 2009
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
> i would imagine that inefficient is the _last_ thing on the list of
> priorities. "technically correctly fulfilling the semantics" i would
> imagine would be the highest priority.
>
> "efficient" and "nice" can always be done later, yes?
No, in many cases efficiency needs to be taken into account in the
design phase. You can't just add it later.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list