(try 2)advapi32: base implementation of LsaLookupNames2
Aric Stewart
aric at codeweavers.com
Thu Mar 19 08:51:00 CDT 2009
Thanks for doing this testing. I think I will move the check to just
skip the test. That way maybe that can become the standard for that
test. Looking at msdn there are several lsa functions that are xp+ only
so we do not want to start blocking the tests on all previous versions also.
thanks!
-aric
Paul Vriens wrote:
> Aric Stewart wrote:
>>
>> fix tests for win95
>> ---
>> dlls/advapi32/lsa.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> dlls/advapi32/tests/lsa.c | 82
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> Hi Aric,
>
> Just tested this on W2K.
>
> All functions but LsaLookupNames2 are available on W2K. This means now
> all tests (even though there were only 6) are skipped.
>
> Not sure it's worth the effort but maybe it's better to test for the
> existence of LsaLookupNames2 in the appropriate test only?
>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list