To error out or to skip tests?

Reece Dunn msclrhd at googlemail.com
Mon Nov 9 13:09:19 CST 2009


2009/11/9 Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com>:
> On 11/09/2009 07:25 PM, Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle at t-systems.com wrote:
>>
>> Reece,
>>
>> I think we reached agreement on:
>> a) Tests should "usually" succeed.
>
> I didn't read that in any of the emails. Tests should always succeed. the
> broken() and skip() will help in achieving that.

I used "usually" succeed to avoid handling out-of-memory cases and
other similar cases.

- Reece



More information about the wine-devel mailing list