New version of my test for bug 4543

Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 09:56:15 CST 2009


On 11/20/2009 04:25 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>> On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed
>>> Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the
>>> contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763
>>> and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I
>>> need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate
>>> representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I only ran your new tests and removed that "if(0)", please find the
>> results attached.
>>
>> Win95/98/me have the same results (as expected) and have several
>> failures (as expected). Fixing them would be a bonus but we currently
>> are having several metafile failures for these platforms anyway.
>>
> Thanks, Paul!
>
> Based on these results, I modified my test (and Wine to pass), using the
> WinXP results as the expected bits. I've submitted the patches to
> wine-patches, so now we'll see what Alexandre thinks.
>
> The Win9x failures mystify me. Why would CreateEnhMetaFileA() fail? I
> need to look into this.

The last error is set to ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND.

>
> Chip
>


-- 
Cheers,

Paul.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list