Should we expect Liberation fonts to be installed?
juan.lang at gmail.com
Tue Aug 17 13:22:02 CDT 2010
>> Is there a meaningful difference in the two licenses for fonts? LGPL
>> is necessary for code, which gets loaded at runtime to a closed-source
>> executable, but fonts contain no code, and thus aren't loaded.
> A good point, but I'm not qualified to answer that. I suspect that the
> SFC would be able to answer it, if it's a serious consideration.
> FWIW, a couple links:
> and the actual license:
The actual license contains the font exception. IANAL, but that would
appear to resolve any transitive license problem that might otherwise
arise from including Liberation fonts.
More information about the wine-devel