Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
Sun Feb 14 14:01:18 CST 2010
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> writes:
> How to fix this?
>
> Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case? Should
> configure error out? (We do have --without-x, too, though.) Anything
> else?
>
> Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure
> later on.
It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the
standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it
doesn't catch that case.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list