Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv

Alexandre Julliard julliard at
Sun Feb 14 14:01:18 CST 2010

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at> writes:

> How to fix this?
> Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case?  Should 
> configure error out?  (We do have --without-x, too, though.)  Anything 
> else?
> Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure
> later on.

It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the
standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it
doesn't catch that case.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list