[tools]winetest: fix child-result coloring and counting

Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Mon Jan 4 15:07:42 CST 2010


On 01/04/2010 10:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Paul Vriens schrieb:
>> On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>>> You can see wrong coloring e.g. here
>>> http://test.winehq.org/data/f74e312bf81032c46bd2ce080a5f6a33c7ac3ee3/wine_ah-910-64-nv/rpcrt4:server.html
>>>
>>> Also the counting is wrong, that unit test is shown in the summary
>>> with 2 errors, but only has 1
>>> This patch fixes the issue. The totalize of those variables is already
>>> made in the "offline" software
>>> ---
>>>    winetest/dissect |    6 +++---
>>>    1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/winetest/dissect b/winetest/dissect
>>> index 16cc118..ce90bda 100755
>>> --- a/winetest/dissect
>>> +++ b/winetest/dissect
>>> @@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ while (<IN>) {
>>>        } elsif (/^(.*$unit.*: (\d+) tests executed \((\d+) marked as
>>> todo, (\d+) failures?\), (\d+) skipped\.)\r?$/) {
>>>            $lines++;
>>>            $total += $2;
>>> -        $todo += $3;
>>> -        $failed += $4;
>>> -        $skipped += $5;
>>> +        $todo = $3;
>>> +        $failed = $4;
>>> +        $skipped = $5;
>>>            chomp;
>>>            s/\r+$//;
>>>            my $class = "test result";
>>
>> Hi André,
>>
>> That log also shows "server: 1 failures in child process". I'm not a
>> 100% sure but from the looks of it this is that one/1 failure mentioned
>> in that last line:
>>
>> server: 120 tests executed (1 marked as todo, 1 failure), 0 skipped.
>>
>> If I'm correct it does mean that we have 2 failures and 1 todo.
>>
>> (cc-ing AJ as he wrote that winetest_wait_child_process() thingy).
>>
>
> Hi Paul,
> it only occurs one failure: "server.c:1412: Test failed: RpcBindingSetAuthInfoExA failed 1747", that one happens in the child process.
> that is mentioned three times:
> server: 7 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 1 failure), 0 skipped.
> server: 1 failures in child process

But is this one actually a failure that is only reported in the line 
below and not by itself as a "Test failed: ......"?

> server: 120 tests executed (1 marked as todo, 1 failure), 0 skipped.
>
> dissect adds up the two summaries, which is wrong.


-- 
Cheers,

Paul.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list