Less than 300 Coverity errors !!

[Austin English]

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the
> last months) got the number of issues below 300.

Thanks Marcus!

> Only 11 of those are marked as either a bug or are pending. The rest is
> either false (Coverity thinks there is an error, but we don't) or to be
> ignored (for example: windows bug-for-bug compatibility or some deliberate
> tests).

I believe I've heard that if we get to 0 verified or pending bugs,
that we're eligible to move up to rung 2, which gives even more
scanning tools. *nudge nudge*

-- 
-Austin