Less than 300 Coverity errors !!

[Marcus Meissner]

On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:17:59AM -0600, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the
> > last months) got the number of issues below 300.
> 
> Thanks Marcus!

No worries. Just some small things I have the time for these days.
 
> > Only 11 of those are marked as either a bug or are pending. The rest is
> > either false (Coverity thinks there is an error, but we don't) or to be
> > ignored (for example: windows bug-for-bug compatibility or some deliberate
> > tests).
> 
> I believe I've heard that if we get to 0 verified or pending bugs,
> that we're eligible to move up to rung 2, which gives even more
> scanning tools. *nudge nudge*

I actually wanted the "zero bugs" to be a surprise ;)
And I overlooked the PENDING bugs, have to go through them too.

Ciao, Marcus