ntdll/tests: Fix a test failure on NT4
paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Sun Jan 10 11:18:45 CST 2010
On 01/10/2010 06:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> sorry didnt see your patch, it was not my purpose to compete for that.
> I also had broken() in mind, but using http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069721.html i am not sure.
The 'problem' with broken() is that it just sounds bad. We also use
broken() to force Wine to use a particular implementation. The fact that
only NT4 has this issue makes it broken() in the sense that we want to
follow the NT4+ implementation.
As said before maybe we need a deprecated() which is the same as
broken() but just doesn't look as bad ;)
More information about the wine-devel