ntdll/tests: Fix a test failure on NT4

[Paul Vriens]

On 01/10/2010 06:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> sorry didnt see your patch, it was not my purpose to compete for that.
> I also had broken() in mind, but using http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069721.html i am not sure.
>

The 'problem' with broken() is that it just sounds bad. We also use 
broken() to force Wine to use a particular implementation. The fact that 
only NT4 has this issue makes it broken() in the sense that we want to 
follow the NT4+ implementation.

As said before maybe we need a deprecated() which is the same as 
broken() but just doesn't look as bad ;)

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.