Any more infos about the build failure for my (small) patch

[James McKenzie]

Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:37:11PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
>   
>> James Mckenzie wrote:
>>     
>>> Octavian Voicu wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Uwe Bonnes
>>>> <bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>    Paul> SSL_CTX *SSL_CTX_new(SSL_METHOD *meth); 61557 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 root
>>>>>    Paul> root 87238 Jun 2 11:11 ./usr/include/openssl/ssl.h
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, Readhat defining in it's own way.
>>>>> What about debian?
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't the OpenSSL documentation way th way it should be?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Ubuntu also has /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h.
>>>> Linux manpages show the same thing: http://linux.die.net/man/3/ssl_ctx_new
>>>>
>>>> Maybe this should go in autoconf?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Have to check the effect on other UNIX variations, including MacOSX before doing this.
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Same will happen here and with Fink (checked the fink .info file and the 
>> openssl include directory has ssl.h.)
>>     
>
> The const was added for the openssl 1.0 release I guess.
>
>   
I had openssl 0.9.8h installed.  I'll be updating Fink tomorrow when I 
have WiFi access.

James McKenzie